Called to order by Jon at 12:05pm (PST)
Present: Alex, Jon, Steve, Matt, Nate, GeirAbsent: Darci (sick, excused)Advisory Members Present: Roberto
Minutes for Jan 22
Jon moved, Matt secondedUnanimously approved
Have they been notified, workflowed on plone.org and added to the list? Announcement on Plone.org?Jon will follow up with Darci
Marketing Committee Reboot
Proposed members have been contacted. Responses nearly all positive so far.
Jon noted donation from Eagle Eye Consulting + Client
Per email that came in this morning.
Renewal of domains
Per Nate's email, he's renewed ploneedu.com, plonengo.org/com/info, and would like us to reimburse and have the Foundation assume ownership of the domains.Nate noted that there’s probably to be use soon for ploneedu.com.
Nate will follow up with Wichert to find details for transfer.
Jon moved approval of up to $40 expenditure to reimburse Nate, Geir seconded.Unanimously approved.
Discuss final draft of Plone.org hosting contract
Jon has been working with Calvin on publicity/recognition question. Terms have been agreed to that don’t require a logo in footer. Geir will get the language into the contract.
Jon moved board authorize Jon to sign contract with revisions. Geir seconded.Unanimously approved.
Discussion: Financial value of our trademarks
Xavier Heymans has suggested that we research whether we can assign a financial value to our trademarks and recognize that on our books in order to more accurately report the true financial worth of the Foundation. Discuss whether we want to spend some resources to pursue this research through our accountant + Toby.
Jon will do some research with other open-source organizations and bring back a report.
Jon moved authorization to spend up to $500 for tax advice on this. Steve seconded.Unanimously approved.
Continue licensing discussions
Discussion: Can/should we "correct" licenses in Martin's projects per Hanno's suggestion?
General agreement that this was already decided by 2006 board. Our standing practice is definitely GPL. Fixing accidental mention of other licenses is expected.
Discussion: How to move forward consideration of general relicensing for selected components
Geir has drafted some language for a poll.
Separate issue: Identify needed clarifications to licensing FAQ (e.g. all new code written in the Plone repository should be GPL, authors don't get to choose), assign responsibility for doing this.
Hanno will be asked to work with Steve to clarify FAQ.
Discussion: possible procedures around selective relicensing to figure out what processes would be feasible, if the membership wants to head this way.
Board might be able to do this selectively for only packages that have no dependencies in plone.app. Procedure might be: 1) request made by interested pary like maintainer or author; 2) verify dependencies; 3) board considers. Only one license alternative. Package maintainer will need to agree to exercise care to make sure dependencies don’t expand.Adjourned at 1:05pm