#142 — Title of weblog entry cannot be a whole number

by Jan Hackel — last modified Jul 06, 2010 03:36 PM

State	Confirmed
Version:	1.7
Area	Functionality
Issue type	Bug
Severity	Low
Submitted by	Jan Hackel
Submitted on	Sep 12, 2008
Responsible	—
Target release:	2.0

Return to tracker

Tags:

TraversalIssue

Entering a number as the title of a blog entry will make Quills interpret the entry id as an archive URL.

Steps to reproduce:: Create a new weblog entry through the web. As title enter "10", for instance. Now save the entry.

You now get an error page telling that the requested page does not exist. This is because it tries to get a weblogentry_view for an archive of year 10. Furthermore you cannot navigate to the entry via it's id. This will show the archive of year 10.

Added by Jan Hackel on Sep 12, 2008 07:52 PM

Target release: 1.7 → None

Responsible manager: jhackel → (UNASSIGNED)

There is now a test-case in svn trunk of Product.Quills demonstrating the issue (rev. 71707).

Added by Jan Hackel on Nov 25, 2008 08:38 PM

Issue state: unconfirmed → open

Target release: None → 1.7

Responsible manager: (UNASSIGNED) → jhackel

Starting to fix...

Added by Jan Hackel on Nov 25, 2008 08:41 PM

Issue state: open → in-progress

Added by Jan Hackel on Feb 26, 2009 10:52 AM

Severity: Medium → Low

Added by Jan Hackel on May 17, 2009 08:54 PM

Issue state: In progress → Postponed

Responsible manager: jhackel → (UNASSIGNED)

Target release: 1.7 → 2.0

Postponing until somewhere before release 2.0. This cannot easily be fixed as it is a issue by design. Any virtual URL Quills uses causes this problem, i.e. authors and topics too. IMO the proper solution would be to define a priority of view, e.g. the archive view always overrides the post view. The blog would emit a warning once the a user *reads* an ambiguous object (e.g. in the archive view shown) which contains a link to the hidden object (the post).

Added by Jan Hackel on May 17, 2009 09:00 PM

Issue state: Postponed → Confirmed

I just realized that "postponed" means sort of "dumped" so I am reopening that issue again.

Added by Lucie Lejard on Jul 06, 2010 03:36 PM

As of July 6h 2010, I confirm this issue is still happening.

No responses can be added.