Forgot your password?
New user?
Document Actions
#2: Issue deadlines
- Contents
Add the ability to define and track deadlines for issues
- Proposed by
- Lukas Zdych
- Proposal type
- User interface, Architecture
- Assigned to release
- State
- rejected
Motivation
In cases where it is important to define issue deadlines and finish issues before such a date, there it would be useful to alert users with issues close to it's deadline or in bad cases after it's deadline.
Proposal
- Add deadline:DateTime to issue schema
- it is very important info for some kinds of tracking
- should be available only with "watch deadlines" turned on in the tracker
- Add watch_deadlines:boolean to tracker schema
- should be used for watching issues which are close to dead-line and those which are behind deadline
- alert issue tracker manager and responsible users about those issues by displaying them in highlited area on title page of tracker
note: proposal still in progress..
You're right if Poi is in use with PSC but..
Posted by
Lukas Zdych
at
December 21, 2005 - 08:36
The signal for makin this proposal was to support more an help-desk scenerio where it's not about just software development but also single tasks and so on where your are not using Poi in combination with PSC for example.
Focus
Posted by
Martin Aspeli
at
December 22, 2005 - 22:07
Yes. The question is where we're headed. I'm actually not very keen on putting this use case into Poi core. Poi is a software tracker first and foremost. It's not a generic ticketing system, it's not a help desk system.
I want to make Poi much more extensible for version 2.0, and here such use cases can be supported. But the more I think about it, allowing "just one more" feature out of the core use case will mean that Poi becomes PloneCollectorNG2 - powerful and heavy.
I want to make Poi much more extensible for version 2.0, and here such use cases can be supported. But the more I think about it, allowing "just one more" feature out of the core use case will mean that Poi becomes PloneCollectorNG2 - powerful and heavy.
Ok.. I agree
Posted by
Lukas Zdych
at
December 22, 2005 - 22:13
So assign this proposal to version 2.0 or simply reject it ;)
Refactored
Posted by
Martin Aspeli
at
December 23, 2005 - 12:57
This is being moved into proposal #8.
Releases