#4 — Assigning owners, importance to issues is too cumbersome
by Martin Aspeli — last modified Jun 20, 2012 01:21 AM
|Submitted by||Martin Aspeli|
|Submitted on||Dec 12, 2005|
Would like to use "Add response" screen for this the same way we assign workflow states
Added by Martin Aspeli on Dec 19, 2005 12:09 AMFurther, we should generalise the 'issue state before/after' functionality into a list of changes performed by a response. The response could hold a list of dicts, each with keys 'name', 'before' and 'after', and the UI could output: changed [name]: [before] -> [after].
Added by Martin Aspeli on Dec 19, 2005 01:39 AMI'm working on this, but it's a pain because it requires migration. Stay tuned. :)
Issue state: open → in-progress
Added by Martin Aspeli on Dec 20, 2005 01:42 AMThis is now fixed in svn.
Issue state: in-progress → resolved
Added by kuaile on Jun 20, 2012 01:21 AMhttp://www.michaelkorsmkvip[…]chael-kors-satchel-c-8.html
No responses can be added.
If you can, please log in before submitting a reaction.