#43 — Reference fields support issues
| State | Unconfirmed |
|---|---|
| Version: |
—
|
| Area | Functionality |
| Issue type | Feature |
| Severity | Medium |
| Submitted by | H. Turgut Uyar |
| Submitted on | Dec 19, 2007 |
| Responsible |
—
|
| Target release: |
—
|
Last modified on
Jan 08, 2009
by
Matthew Wilkes
I compared the fields for references in CMFBibliographyAT and KBibTeX and saw the following differences:
- for ArticleReferences: add ISSN
- for InproceedingsReferences: add ISBN and Location, remove Organization
- for InbookReferences: add ISBN, Volume
- for PhdThesisReferences: add ISBN
Besides, KBibTeX reports that the Note field for UnpublishedReferences is mandatory. And all these reference types seem to support Editor.
- for ArticleReferences: add ISSN
- for InproceedingsReferences: add ISBN and Location, remove Organization
- for InbookReferences: add ISBN, Volume
- for PhdThesisReferences: add ISBN
Besides, KBibTeX reports that the Note field for UnpublishedReferences is mandatory. And all these reference types seem to support Editor.
Added byH. Turgut UyaronDec 19, 2007 02:20 PM
Actually, the code for UnpublishedReference contains the required note field setting and that is even documented. But it doesn't work maybe due to a missing schema=UnpublishedReferenceSchema line in the UnpublishedReference class.
Added byH. Turgut UyaronDec 19, 2007 02:23 PM
Actually, the code for UnpublishedReference contains the required note field setting and that is even documented. But it doesn't work maybe due to a missing schema=UnpublishedSchema line in the UnpublishedReference class.
No responses can be added.