#43 — Reference fields support issues
by
H. Turgut Uyar
—
last modified
Jan 08, 2009 02:38 PM
| State | Unconfirmed |
|---|---|
| Version: |
—
|
| Area | Functionality |
| Issue type | Feature |
| Severity | Medium |
| Submitted by | H. Turgut Uyar |
| Submitted on | Dec 19, 2007 |
| Responsible |
—
|
| Target release: |
—
|
I compared the fields for references in CMFBibliographyAT and KBibTeX and saw the following differences:
- for ArticleReferences: add ISSN
- for InproceedingsReferences: add ISBN and Location, remove Organization
- for InbookReferences: add ISBN, Volume
- for PhdThesisReferences: add ISBN
Besides, KBibTeX reports that the Note field for UnpublishedReferences is mandatory. And all these reference types seem to support Editor.
- for ArticleReferences: add ISSN
- for InproceedingsReferences: add ISBN and Location, remove Organization
- for InbookReferences: add ISBN, Volume
- for PhdThesisReferences: add ISBN
Besides, KBibTeX reports that the Note field for UnpublishedReferences is mandatory. And all these reference types seem to support Editor.
Added by
H. Turgut Uyar
on
Dec 19, 2007 02:20 PM
Actually, the code for UnpublishedReference contains the required note field setting and that is even documented. But it doesn't work maybe due to a missing schema=UnpublishedReferenceSchema line in the UnpublishedReference class.
Added by
H. Turgut Uyar
on
Dec 19, 2007 02:23 PM
Actually, the code for UnpublishedReference contains the required note field setting and that is even documented. But it doesn't work maybe due to a missing schema=UnpublishedSchema line in the UnpublishedReference class.
No responses can be added.
If you can, please log in before submitting a reaction.